Parts Of A Patent Application

The C-I-P application adds subject matter not previously disclosed in the parent patent application covering American Manganese flagship lithium-ion battery recycling technology. Since the filing …

Provisional Utility Patent Under United States patent law, a provisional application is a legal document filed in the United States Patent and trademark office (uspto), that establishes an early filing date, but does not mature into an issued patent unless the applicant files a regular non-provisional patent application within one year. There is no such thing as a
Patent Bar Exam Joining the patent bar requires passing the patent bar exam, an additional exam that primarily tests PTO rules and procedures. Yet the pto generally prohibits people from even sitting for the patent … one must register and pass the patent exam, also known as the patent bar. The applicant must also demonstrate he or she

Chinese telecoms giant Huawei filed the most number of patent applications among corporate applicants with … The number of patents Huawei filed related to 5G also accounted for a large part of total …

Shenzhen-based Huawei, which has been under pressure since the united states demanded its allies bar Chinese vendors from taking part in building 5G mobile networks because of national security …

American Manganese Inc (OTCMKTS:AMYZF) (CVE:AMY) has filed an updated patent application covering its flagship lithium-ion battery recycling technology. The continuation in part (C-I-P) patent now …

How To Draft A Provisional Patent Application Manual of patent examining procedure. chapter 0600 Parts, Form, and Content of Application

The main parts of a utility application’s specification are: Title: a good title is technically descriptive, identifies the field of the invention and is brief. Related applications: if your patent application is related to a prior filing, like a provisional application, then you must identify it by its serial number.

The CAFC barons need to study 37 CFR 1.77 and see that “a plurality” listed in the ‘777 belongs to the field of the invention and the prior art. The Gillette decision (see also the strange application of the Markush group) is a landmark of patent law incompetence, I call it the OJ patent decision.